RICHIN vs SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
RICHIN: 5
vs
SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RICHIN | SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 97 cal | 99 cal | |
| Protein | 13.6 g | 22.5 g | |
| Carbs | 2.6 g | 1.4 g | |
| Fat | 3.2 g | 1.4 g | |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RICHIN | SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.5 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | RICHIN | SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 258 MG | 28 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.7 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 324 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 194 MG | 225 MG |