RICH DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED MACADAMIAS vs NO SALT ROASTED ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NO SALT ROASTED ALMONDS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
RICH DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED MACADAMIAS: 2
vs
NO SALT ROASTED ALMONDS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RICH DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED MACADAMIAS | NO SALT ROASTED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 595 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 25 g | |
| Fat | 40.5 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 14.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RICH DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED MACADAMIAS | NO SALT ROASTED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RICH DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED MACADAMIAS | NO SALT ROASTED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 48 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 8.6 MG | 19.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 24 MG | 171 MG |