RET BAG V/P TUNA STK vs 16/32 OZ S/P POLLOCK FILL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
16/32 OZ S/P POLLOCK FILL wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
RET BAG V/P TUNA STK: 4
vs
16/32 OZ S/P POLLOCK FILL: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RET BAG V/P TUNA STK | 16/32 OZ S/P POLLOCK FILL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 82 cal | 89 cal | |
| Protein | 14.7 g | 19.6 g | |
| Carbs | 2.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RET BAG V/P TUNA STK | 16/32 OZ S/P POLLOCK FILL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.2 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | RET BAG V/P TUNA STK | 16/32 OZ S/P POLLOCK FILL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 46 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 294 MG | 357 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 24 MG | 89 MG |