RET BAG S/ON WHITING FIL vs .75-1 WGGS LANE SNAPPER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RET BAG S/ON WHITING FIL wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
RET BAG S/ON WHITING FIL: 4
vs
.75-1 WGGS LANE SNAPPER: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RET BAG S/ON WHITING FIL | .75-1 WGGS LANE SNAPPER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 89 cal | 98 cal | |
| Protein | 18.8 g | 20.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 1.3 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RET BAG S/ON WHITING FIL | .75-1 WGGS LANE SNAPPER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | RET BAG S/ON WHITING FIL | .75-1 WGGS LANE SNAPPER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 49 MG | 32 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 249 MG | 420 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 71 MG | 62 MG |