RESTAURANT-STYLE CHIK'N TENDERS vs BEEF TENDERLOIN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BEEF TENDERLOIN wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
RESTAURANT-STYLE CHIK'N TENDERS: 4
vs
BEEF TENDERLOIN: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RESTAURANT-STYLE CHIK'N TENDERS | BEEF TENDERLOIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 228 cal | 152 cal | |
| Protein | 19.3 g | 20.7 g | |
| Carbs | 22.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 7.9 g | 7.6 g | |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RESTAURANT-STYLE CHIK'N TENDERS | BEEF TENDERLOIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RESTAURANT-STYLE CHIK'N TENDERS | BEEF TENDERLOIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 88 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 2.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 88 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 789 MG | 63 MG |