REDUCED FAT GROUND PORK vs DICED CHIK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DICED CHIK wins in 10 out of 16 nutrient categories
REDUCED FAT GROUND PORK: 2
vs
DICED CHIK: 10
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | REDUCED FAT GROUND PORK | DICED CHIK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 241 cal | 91 cal | |
| Protein | 18.8 g | 16.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 17.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | REDUCED FAT GROUND PORK | DICED CHIK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 7.3 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin B-12 | 0 UG | 0.4 UG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0 MG | 0.1 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | REDUCED FAT GROUND PORK | DICED CHIK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 2.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 182 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 179 MG | 400 MG |