REDUCED FAT COCONUT MILK vs SILK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SILK wins in 11 out of 16 nutrient categories
REDUCED FAT COCONUT MILK: 3
vs
SILK: 11
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | REDUCED FAT COCONUT MILK | SILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 119 cal | 38 cal | |
| Protein | 1.7 g | 0.4 g | |
| Carbs | 3.4 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 10.2 g | 1.0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | REDUCED FAT COCONUT MILK | SILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 0 UG | 1.3 UG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 2 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | REDUCED FAT COCONUT MILK | SILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 188 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Magnesium, Mg | 0 MG | 7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 156 MG | 15 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 34 MG | 67 MG | |
| Zinc, Zn | 0 MG | 0.5 MG |