RED HOT LINKS vs SWEET ITALIAN STYLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SWEET ITALIAN STYLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
RED HOT LINKS: 3
vs
SWEET ITALIAN STYLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RED HOT LINKS | SWEET ITALIAN STYLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 141 cal | |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 16.7 g | |
| Carbs | 5.4 g | 1.3 g | |
| Fat | 19.6 g | 7.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RED HOT LINKS | SWEET ITALIAN STYLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.1 MG | 3.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | RED HOT LINKS | SWEET ITALIAN STYLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 143 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 875 MG | 513 MG |