READY TO SERVE MICROWAVEABLE LONG GRAIN WHITE RICE vs SWEET TAMALE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
READY TO SERVE MICROWAVEABLE LONG GRAIN WHITE RICE wins in 7 out of 13 nutrient categories
READY TO SERVE MICROWAVEABLE LONG GRAIN WHITE RICE: 7
vs
SWEET TAMALE: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | READY TO SERVE MICROWAVEABLE LONG GRAIN WHITE RICE | SWEET TAMALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 157 cal | 236 cal | |
| Protein | 2.9 g | 1.8 g | |
| Carbs | 33.6 g | 40 g | |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 8.2 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 3.6 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | READY TO SERVE MICROWAVEABLE LONG GRAIN WHITE RICE | SWEET TAMALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 1.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 3.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | READY TO SERVE MICROWAVEABLE LONG GRAIN WHITE RICE | SWEET TAMALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 14 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 7.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 43 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 136 MG | 41 MG |