RARE FARE FOODS vs EMERALD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
EMERALD wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
RARE FARE FOODS: 4
vs
EMERALD: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RARE FARE FOODS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 607 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 25 g | |
| Carbs | 57.1 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fat | 25 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 10.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RARE FARE FOODS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RARE FARE FOODS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 2.6 MG | Tie |
| Phosphorus, P | 357 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 268 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 18 MG | 929 MG |