PULLED ROTISSERIE SEASONED CHICKEN vs HAM STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PULLED ROTISSERIE SEASONED CHICKEN wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
PULLED ROTISSERIE SEASONED CHICKEN: 6
vs
HAM STEAK: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PULLED ROTISSERIE SEASONED CHICKEN | HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 125 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 1.2 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PULLED ROTISSERIE SEASONED CHICKEN | HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 26.8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PULLED ROTISSERIE SEASONED CHICKEN | HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 512 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 536 MG | 893 MG |