PROSCIUTTO COTTO CLASSIC ITALIAN COOKED HAM vs BUFFALO STYLE CHICKEN BREAST
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BUFFALO STYLE CHICKEN BREAST wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
PROSCIUTTO COTTO CLASSIC ITALIAN COOKED HAM: 2
vs
BUFFALO STYLE CHICKEN BREAST: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PROSCIUTTO COTTO CLASSIC ITALIAN COOKED HAM | BUFFALO STYLE CHICKEN BREAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 cal | 125 cal | |
| Protein | 19.6 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fat | 7.1 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PROSCIUTTO COTTO CLASSIC ITALIAN COOKED HAM | BUFFALO STYLE CHICKEN BREAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PROSCIUTTO COTTO CLASSIC ITALIAN COOKED HAM | BUFFALO STYLE CHICKEN BREAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.6 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 679 MG | 911 MG |