POT ROAST SLOW COOKED BEEF CHUCK vs MISO SALMON WITH UDON NOODLES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
POT ROAST SLOW COOKED BEEF CHUCK wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
POT ROAST SLOW COOKED BEEF CHUCK: 7
vs
MISO SALMON WITH UDON NOODLES: 3
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | POT ROAST SLOW COOKED BEEF CHUCK | MISO SALMON WITH UDON NOODLES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 98 cal | 133 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 8.6 g | |
| Carbs | 8.7 g | 14.5 g | |
| Fat | 3.9 g | 4.7 g | |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | POT ROAST SLOW COOKED BEEF CHUCK | MISO SALMON WITH UDON NOODLES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 7.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | POT ROAST SLOW COOKED BEEF CHUCK | MISO SALMON WITH UDON NOODLES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 20 MG | 16 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 163 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 166 MG | 227 MG |