PORK TAMALES vs ORGANIC SHELLED EDAMAME MUKIMAME SWEET SOYBEANS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORGANIC SHELLED EDAMAME MUKIMAME SWEET SOYBEANS wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
PORK TAMALES: 2
vs
ORGANIC SHELLED EDAMAME MUKIMAME SWEET SOYBEANS: 8
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PORK TAMALES | ORGANIC SHELLED EDAMAME MUKIMAME SWEET SOYBEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 240 cal | 10 cal | |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 11.0 g | |
| Carbs | 16.7 g | 7.3 g | |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 4.9 g | |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 4.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PORK TAMALES | ORGANIC SHELLED EDAMAME MUKIMAME SWEET SOYBEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0.8 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PORK TAMALES | ORGANIC SHELLED EDAMAME MUKIMAME SWEET SOYBEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 40 MG | 60 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 482 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 673 MG | 0 MG |