PORK RINDS vs TRADITIONAL COUNTRY CRACKLINS HARD RINDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL COUNTRY CRACKLINS HARD RINDS wins in 1 out of 7 nutrient categories
PORK RINDS: 0
vs
TRADITIONAL COUNTRY CRACKLINS HARD RINDS: 1
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PORK RINDS | TRADITIONAL COUNTRY CRACKLINS HARD RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 571 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 57.1 g | 57.1 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 35.7 g | 35.7 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PORK RINDS | TRADITIONAL COUNTRY CRACKLINS HARD RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium, Na | 1,643 MG | 3,214 MG |