PORK LUMPIA SHANGHAI SPRING ROLL vs CLASSIC CORN DOGS BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN FRANKS ON A STICK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC CORN DOGS BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN FRANKS ON A STICK wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
PORK LUMPIA SHANGHAI SPRING ROLL: 4
vs
CLASSIC CORN DOGS BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN FRANKS ON A STICK: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PORK LUMPIA SHANGHAI SPRING ROLL | CLASSIC CORN DOGS BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN FRANKS ON A STICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 224 cal | 263 cal | |
| Protein | 9.4 g | 9.2 g | |
| Carbs | 14.1 g | 32.9 g | |
| Fat | 14.1 g | 11.8 g | |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 1.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PORK LUMPIA SHANGHAI SPRING ROLL | CLASSIC CORN DOGS BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN FRANKS ON A STICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.8 MG | 7.9 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PORK LUMPIA SHANGHAI SPRING ROLL | CLASSIC CORN DOGS BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN FRANKS ON A STICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 53 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 553 MG | 789 MG |