Pork Ham Knuckle vs BEEF HANGING TENDERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BEEF HANGING TENDERS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
Pork Ham Knuckle: 3
vs
BEEF HANGING TENDERS: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | Pork Ham Knuckle | BEEF HANGING TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 27 cal | 152 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 23.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 3.1 g | 6.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | Pork Ham Knuckle | BEEF HANGING TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | Pork Ham Knuckle | BEEF HANGING TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 29 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 348 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 89 MG | 58 MG |