Pork Fatback Skin vs FRANK ALL BEEF
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FRANK ALL BEEF wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
Pork Fatback Skin: 1
vs
FRANK ALL BEEF: 6
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | Pork Fatback Skin | FRANK ALL BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 619 cal | 319 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 11.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 5.6 g | |
| Fat | 65.5 g | 29.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | Pork Fatback Skin | FRANK ALL BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | Pork Fatback Skin | FRANK ALL BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 1.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 514 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 381 MG | 917 MG |