PORK BACK RIBS vs BUFFALO-STYLE WHITE MEAT CHICKEN SUB
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BUFFALO-STYLE WHITE MEAT CHICKEN SUB wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
PORK BACK RIBS: 4
vs
BUFFALO-STYLE WHITE MEAT CHICKEN SUB: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PORK BACK RIBS | BUFFALO-STYLE WHITE MEAT CHICKEN SUB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 236 cal | 220 cal | |
| Protein | 16.4 g | 14.0 g | |
| Carbs | 13.6 g | 23.1 g | |
| Fat | 12.1 g | 9.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PORK BACK RIBS | BUFFALO-STYLE WHITE MEAT CHICKEN SUB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PORK BACK RIBS | BUFFALO-STYLE WHITE MEAT CHICKEN SUB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 125 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.5 MG | 1.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 72 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 400 MG | 1 MG |