PLANT-BASED GROUND vs ANGUS BEEF CHUCK ROAST
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PLANT-BASED GROUND wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
PLANT-BASED GROUND: 5
vs
ANGUS BEEF CHUCK ROAST: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PLANT-BASED GROUND | ANGUS BEEF CHUCK ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 277 cal | 196 cal | |
| Protein | 16.9 g | 18.8 g | |
| Carbs | 9.2 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 16.9 g | 13.4 g | |
| Fiber | 7.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PLANT-BASED GROUND | ANGUS BEEF CHUCK ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PLANT-BASED GROUND | ANGUS BEEF CHUCK ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 40 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.1 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 240 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 385 MG | 80 MG |