Pillsbury Mini Double Chocolate Soft Baked Cookies vs Bisquick All-Purpose Baking Mix
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
Pillsbury Mini Double Chocolate Soft Baked Cookies: 5
vs
Bisquick All-Purpose Baking Mix: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | Pillsbury Mini Double Chocolate Soft Baked Cookies | Bisquick All-Purpose Baking Mix | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467.6 cal | 375 cal | |
| Protein | 4.0 g | 7.5 g | |
| Carbs | 66.3 g | 70 g | |
| Fat | 20.7 g | 7.5 g | |
| Fiber | 3.0 g | 2.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | Pillsbury Mini Double Chocolate Soft Baked Cookies | Bisquick All-Purpose Baking Mix | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0.0 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | Pillsbury Mini Double Chocolate Soft Baked Cookies | Bisquick All-Purpose Baking Mix | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 19.7 MG | 150 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.2 MG | 3.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 231.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 226.4 MG | 950 MG |