PETITE CUT BONELESS BEEF BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK vs TOFURKY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TOFURKY wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
PETITE CUT BONELESS BEEF BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK: 3
vs
TOFURKY: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PETITE CUT BONELESS BEEF BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK | TOFURKY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 142 cal | 309 cal | |
| Protein | 19.5 g | 29.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 10.9 g | |
| Fat | 6.2 g | 14.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 7.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PETITE CUT BONELESS BEEF BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK | TOFURKY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PETITE CUT BONELESS BEEF BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK | TOFURKY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 109 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 691 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 319 MG | 491 MG |