PATAGONIAN PINK EASY-PEEL vs PANAPESCA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
PATAGONIAN PINK EASY-PEEL: 4
vs
PANAPESCA: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PATAGONIAN PINK EASY-PEEL | PANAPESCA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 80 cal | 91 cal | |
| Protein | 17.7 g | 15 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 2 g | |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PATAGONIAN PINK EASY-PEEL | PANAPESCA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 7.2 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PATAGONIAN PINK EASY-PEEL | PANAPESCA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 53 MG | 60 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 5.0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 230 MG | 490 MG |