PATAGONIAN PINK EASY-PEEL vs ALASKA SKINLESS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
PATAGONIAN PINK EASY-PEEL: 3
vs
ALASKA SKINLESS: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PATAGONIAN PINK EASY-PEEL | ALASKA SKINLESS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 88 cal | 70 cal | |
| Protein | 16.8 g | 17.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PATAGONIAN PINK EASY-PEEL | ALASKA SKINLESS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PATAGONIAN PINK EASY-PEEL | ALASKA SKINLESS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 81 MG | 21 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 138 MG | 331 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 283 MG | 106 MG |