PARRISH RANCH vs TRADITIONAL HUMMUS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL HUMMUS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
PARRISH RANCH: 2
vs
TRADITIONAL HUMMUS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PARRISH RANCH | TRADITIONAL HUMMUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 491 cal | 246 cal | |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 7.0 g | |
| Carbs | 70.7 g | 12.3 g | |
| Fat | 24.4 g | 19.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PARRISH RANCH | TRADITIONAL HUMMUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PARRISH RANCH | TRADITIONAL HUMMUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 35 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 74 MG | 439 MG |