PARMESAN STYLE REDUCED FAT GRATED TOPPING vs CHEDDAR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
PARMESAN STYLE REDUCED FAT GRATED TOPPING: 4
vs
CHEDDAR: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PARMESAN STYLE REDUCED FAT GRATED TOPPING | CHEDDAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 867 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 196.7 g | |
| Carbs | 40 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 20 g | 33.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PARMESAN STYLE REDUCED FAT GRATED TOPPING | CHEDDAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PARMESAN STYLE REDUCED FAT GRATED TOPPING | CHEDDAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 600 MG | 567 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 3,333 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,800 MG | 1,767 MG |