PANTAINORASINGH BRAND vs BLUE LAKE CUT GREEN BEANS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PANTAINORASINGH BRAND wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
PANTAINORASINGH BRAND: 5
vs
BLUE LAKE CUT GREEN BEANS: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PANTAINORASINGH BRAND | BLUE LAKE CUT GREEN BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 11 cal | 21 cal | |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 2.2 g | 4.2 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PANTAINORASINGH BRAND | BLUE LAKE CUT GREEN BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PANTAINORASINGH BRAND | BLUE LAKE CUT GREEN BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,235 MG | 225 MG |