PANAPESCA vs COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PANAPESCA wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
PANAPESCA: 5
vs
COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PANAPESCA | COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 178 cal | 94 cal | |
| Protein | 24 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 6 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 2 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PANAPESCA | COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 18 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PANAPESCA | COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 120 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 13.7 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 440 MG | 224 MG |