ORIGINAL SCUNGILLI SLICED CONCH vs ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL SCUNGILLI SLICED CONCH: 4
vs
ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL SCUNGILLI SLICED CONCH | ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 59 cal | 118 cal | |
| Protein | 10.6 g | 18.8 g | |
| Carbs | 3.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 4.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL SCUNGILLI SLICED CONCH | ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 29 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL SCUNGILLI SLICED CONCH | ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 224 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 153 MG | 322 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 553 MG | 353 MG |