ORIGINAL FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES vs ICED OATMEAL COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ICED OATMEAL COOKIES wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES: 0
vs
ICED OATMEAL COOKIES: 7
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES | ICED OATMEAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 3.6 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 67.9 g | 67.9 g | Tie |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 14.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES | ICED OATMEAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 46 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.6 MG | 7.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 107 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 286 MG | 321 MG |