ORGANIC SKIM MILK vs BUTTERMILK CULTURED NONFAT BLEND
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BUTTERMILK CULTURED NONFAT BLEND wins in 4 out of 12 nutrient categories
ORGANIC SKIM MILK: 3
vs
BUTTERMILK CULTURED NONFAT BLEND: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORGANIC SKIM MILK | BUTTERMILK CULTURED NONFAT BLEND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 38 cal | 38 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.8 g | |
| Carbs | 5.4 g | 5.9 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORGANIC SKIM MILK | BUTTERMILK CULTURED NONFAT BLEND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 2 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORGANIC SKIM MILK | BUTTERMILK CULTURED NONFAT BLEND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 125 MG | 127 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Phosphorus, P | 104 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 54 MG | 178 MG |