ORGANIC ANCIENT GRAIN FUSION vs CHIPOTLE BEEF SLOW COOKER SOLUTIONS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHIPOTLE BEEF SLOW COOKER SOLUTIONS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
ORGANIC ANCIENT GRAIN FUSION: 4
vs
CHIPOTLE BEEF SLOW COOKER SOLUTIONS: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORGANIC ANCIENT GRAIN FUSION | CHIPOTLE BEEF SLOW COOKER SOLUTIONS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 93 cal | 238 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 16.4 g | 59.5 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 2.4 g | |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 28.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORGANIC ANCIENT GRAIN FUSION | CHIPOTLE BEEF SLOW COOKER SOLUTIONS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 10.7 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORGANIC ANCIENT GRAIN FUSION | CHIPOTLE BEEF SLOW COOKER SOLUTIONS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 14 MG | 45 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 5.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 667 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 136 MG | 833 MG |