OLD WISCONSIN vs BANGERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BANGERS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
OLD WISCONSIN: 3
vs
BANGERS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | OLD WISCONSIN | BANGERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 286 cal | 224 cal | |
| Protein | 12.2 g | 15.8 g | |
| Carbs | 2.0 g | 6.6 g | |
| Fat | 24.5 g | 14.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | OLD WISCONSIN | BANGERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | OLD WISCONSIN | BANGERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 41 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 898 MG | 750 MG |