OLD FASHIONED OATMEAL COOKIES vs LANCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LANCE wins in 7 out of 15 nutrient categories
OLD FASHIONED OATMEAL COOKIES: 6
vs
LANCE: 7
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | OLD FASHIONED OATMEAL COOKIES | LANCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 484 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 8.4 g | |
| Carbs | 67.9 g | 69.5 g | |
| Fat | 16.1 g | 19.0 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 6.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | OLD FASHIONED OATMEAL COOKIES | LANCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 4.2 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.5 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | OLD FASHIONED OATMEAL COOKIES | LANCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 14 MG | 84 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.6 MG | 2.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 86 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 446 MG | 337 MG |