OLD FASHIONED ICED OATMEAL COOKIES vs FUDGE-COVERED SANDWICH COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
OLD FASHIONED ICED OATMEAL COOKIES wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
OLD FASHIONED ICED OATMEAL COOKIES: 5
vs
FUDGE-COVERED SANDWICH COOKIES: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | OLD FASHIONED ICED OATMEAL COOKIES | FUDGE-COVERED SANDWICH COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 957 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 8.7 g | |
| Carbs | 67.9 g | 134.8 g | |
| Fat | 16.1 g | 43.5 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 4.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | OLD FASHIONED ICED OATMEAL COOKIES | FUDGE-COVERED SANDWICH COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | OLD FASHIONED ICED OATMEAL COOKIES | FUDGE-COVERED SANDWICH COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 14 MG | 87 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.6 MG | 6.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 82 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 429 MG | 43 MG |