OLD FASHIONED COOKED HAM vs THICK SLICED BEEF BOLOGNA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
OLD FASHIONED COOKED HAM wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
OLD FASHIONED COOKED HAM: 5
vs
THICK SLICED BEEF BOLOGNA: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | OLD FASHIONED COOKED HAM | THICK SLICED BEEF BOLOGNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 120 cal | 321 cal | |
| Protein | 16 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 2 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fat | 4 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | OLD FASHIONED COOKED HAM | THICK SLICED BEEF BOLOGNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | OLD FASHIONED COOKED HAM | THICK SLICED BEEF BOLOGNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,120 MG | 964 MG |