OATMEAL RAISIN COOKIES vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
OATMEAL RAISIN COOKIES wins in 8 out of 12 nutrient categories
OATMEAL RAISIN COOKIES: 8
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | OATMEAL RAISIN COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 411 cal | |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 62.5 g | 58.9 g | |
| Fat | 15.6 g | 17.9 g | |
| Fiber | 6.2 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | OATMEAL RAISIN COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 7 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | OATMEAL RAISIN COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 62 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 375 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 156 MG | 339 MG |