OATMEAL OLD FASHIONED COOKIES vs SHUR SAVING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SHUR SAVING wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
OATMEAL OLD FASHIONED COOKIES: 2
vs
SHUR SAVING: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | OATMEAL OLD FASHIONED COOKIES | SHUR SAVING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 469 cal | 440 cal | |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 8 g | |
| Carbs | 71.9 g | 60 g | |
| Fat | 18.8 g | 20 g | |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | OATMEAL OLD FASHIONED COOKIES | SHUR SAVING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | OATMEAL OLD FASHIONED COOKIES | SHUR SAVING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.3 MG | 2.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 531 MG | 380 MG |