NO SALTED ADDED SKINLESS & BONELESS MACKEREL IN WATER vs WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
NO SALTED ADDED SKINLESS & BONELESS MACKEREL IN WATER: 3
vs
WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NO SALTED ADDED SKINLESS & BONELESS MACKEREL IN WATER | WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 118 cal | |
| Protein | 23.5 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 7.1 g | 4.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NO SALTED ADDED SKINLESS & BONELESS MACKEREL IN WATER | WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 176 MG | 235 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.5 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 124 MG | 329 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 200 MG | 306 MG |