NO SALT ADDED ALBACORE WILD TUNA vs CHICKEN OF THE SEA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN OF THE SEA wins in 7 out of 16 nutrient categories
NO SALT ADDED ALBACORE WILD TUNA: 4
vs
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 7
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NO SALT ADDED ALBACORE WILD TUNA | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 118 cal | 114 cal | |
| Protein | 24.7 g | 22.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 2.9 g | 2.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NO SALT ADDED ALBACORE WILD TUNA | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 10 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 0 UG | 0.9 UG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 7 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | NO SALT ADDED ALBACORE WILD TUNA | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 247 MG | 136 MG | |
| Selenium, Se | 0 UG | 110 UG | |
| Sodium, Na | 100 MG | 257 MG |