NEW ENGLAND STYLE HOT DOG ROLLS vs SOURDOUGH ENGLISH MUFFINS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NEW ENGLAND STYLE HOT DOG ROLLS wins in 9 out of 15 nutrient categories
NEW ENGLAND STYLE HOT DOG ROLLS: 9
vs
SOURDOUGH ENGLISH MUFFINS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NEW ENGLAND STYLE HOT DOG ROLLS | SOURDOUGH ENGLISH MUFFINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 282 cal | 262 cal | |
| Protein | 7.7 g | 9.2 g | |
| Carbs | 51.3 g | 52.3 g | |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 2.3 g | |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | 1.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NEW ENGLAND STYLE HOT DOG ROLLS | SOURDOUGH ENGLISH MUFFINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Folate, total | 108 UG | 0 UG | |
| Niacin | 4.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Thiamin | 1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NEW ENGLAND STYLE HOT DOG ROLLS | SOURDOUGH ENGLISH MUFFINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 90 MG | 231 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.8 MG | 2.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 90 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 436 MG | 400 MG |