NEW ENGLAND STYLE FRANK ROLLS vs SOURDOUGH
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NEW ENGLAND STYLE FRANK ROLLS wins in 8 out of 16 nutrient categories
NEW ENGLAND STYLE FRANK ROLLS: 8
vs
SOURDOUGH: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NEW ENGLAND STYLE FRANK ROLLS | SOURDOUGH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 256 cal | 214 cal | |
| Protein | 7.0 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 46.5 g | 46.4 g | |
| Fat | 4.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NEW ENGLAND STYLE FRANK ROLLS | SOURDOUGH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Folate, total | 272 UG | 0 UG | |
| Niacin | 5.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0.7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Thiamin | 1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NEW ENGLAND STYLE FRANK ROLLS | SOURDOUGH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 116 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 6.7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 93 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 442 MG | 464 MG |