NATURAL SLICED ALMONDS vs RICH DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED MACADAMIAS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NATURAL SLICED ALMONDS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
NATURAL SLICED ALMONDS: 5
vs
RICH DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED MACADAMIAS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NATURAL SLICED ALMONDS | RICH DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED MACADAMIAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 577 cal | 595 cal | |
| Protein | 23.1 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 23.1 g | 50 g | |
| Fat | 50 g | 40.5 g | |
| Fiber | 11.5 g | 7.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NATURAL SLICED ALMONDS | RICH DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED MACADAMIAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NATURAL SLICED ALMONDS | RICH DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED MACADAMIAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 231 MG | 48 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.2 MG | 8.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 24 MG |