NATURAL CASING FRANKS WITH BEEF AND PORK vs PAMANA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PAMANA wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
NATURAL CASING FRANKS WITH BEEF AND PORK: 2
vs
PAMANA: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NATURAL CASING FRANKS WITH BEEF AND PORK | PAMANA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 304 cal | 279 cal | |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 11.6 g | |
| Carbs | 5.4 g | 4.7 g | |
| Fat | 25 g | 20.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NATURAL CASING FRANKS WITH BEEF AND PORK | PAMANA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 482 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 804 MG | 860 MG |