NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS vs SMOKEY FORAGER'S ROAST
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SMOKEY FORAGER'S ROAST wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS: 3
vs
SMOKEY FORAGER'S ROAST: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS | SMOKEY FORAGER'S ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 220 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 21 g | |
| Carbs | 20.2 g | 15 g | |
| Fat | 11.9 g | 8 g | |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS | SMOKEY FORAGER'S ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS | SMOKEY FORAGER'S ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 20 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.8 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 167 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 643 MG | 800 MG |