NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS vs PLANT-BASED 2 CHIK'N CUTLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS: 6
vs
PLANT-BASED 2 CHIK'N CUTLETS: 3
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS | PLANT-BASED 2 CHIK'N CUTLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 270 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 17 g | |
| Carbs | 20.2 g | 23 g | |
| Fat | 11.9 g | 12 g | |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS | PLANT-BASED 2 CHIK'N CUTLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 60 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.8 MG | 1.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 167 MG | 420 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 643 MG | 530 MG |