NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) vs CHOPPED CLAMS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOPPED CLAMS wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
NANG FAH (TUE KUNG): 1
vs
CHOPPED CLAMS: 7
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | CHOPPED CLAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 260 cal | 55 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 10.9 g | |
| Carbs | 13.3 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 20 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | CHOPPED CLAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 12 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | CHOPPED CLAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 73 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 260 MG | 364 MG |