NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) vs BRISLING SARDINES IN EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BRISLING SARDINES IN EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
NANG FAH (TUE KUNG): 3
vs
BRISLING SARDINES IN EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | BRISLING SARDINES IN EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 260 cal | 305 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 22.0 g | |
| Carbs | 13.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 20 g | 24.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | BRISLING SARDINES IN EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 12 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | BRISLING SARDINES IN EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 305 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 171 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 260 MG | 402 MG |