NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) vs LEE KUM KEE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
NANG FAH (TUE KUNG): 7
vs
LEE KUM KEE: 2
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | LEE KUM KEE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 307 cal | 314 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 2.9 g | |
| Carbs | 46.7 g | 31.4 g | |
| Fat | 13.3 g | 17.1 g | |
| Fiber | 20 g | 2.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | LEE KUM KEE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 20 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | LEE KUM KEE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 467 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 13.2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,720 MG | 3,543 MG |