NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND vs SAUCE, CHIPOTLE APPLE RASPBERRY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND: 5
vs
SAUCE, CHIPOTLE APPLE RASPBERRY: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND | SAUCE, CHIPOTLE APPLE RASPBERRY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 267 cal | 200 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 40 g | 55 g | |
| Fat | 10 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND | SAUCE, CHIPOTLE APPLE RASPBERRY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND | SAUCE, CHIPOTLE APPLE RASPBERRY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 200 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,933 MG | 275 MG |